Home > Preservation News >

Saint Andrew’s Rectory Demolished

Stamford. The Rectory of Saint Andrew’s Episcopal Church was demolished on February 11, after Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro ruled against preservationists in a lawsuit brought under the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) to preserve the house.

 

Save Old Stamford (SOS) filed the lawsuit in December under CEPA, which allows any citizen to sue to prevent "the unreasonable destruction of historic structures and landmarks of the state"—defined as those listed on or under consideration for the National Register of Historic Places (see CPN, September/October 2009, January/February 2010).

 

The congregation has declined in numbers and has tried for years to develop part of its large downtown property. Several schemes have been proposed, some incorporating the house and some not. The latest scheme, with developer Randy Salvatore, calls for razing the stone house and building a 94-unit apartment tower.

 

Under his agreement with Saint Andrew’s, Salvatore pays the church $20,000 per month ground rent and will continue to do so until the new building is 85 percent occupied, at which time he will complete the purchase. This agreement made the church, rather than Salvatore, responsible for getting planning approvals for the project and for demolishing the historic rectory.

 

Moreover, during the trial, Salvatore said he would abandon the deal if forced to save the house. The Rev. Richard Alton, the church’s priest-in-charge, testified that Saint Andrew’s depends on Salvatore’s payments to keep operating. One half of the money was going regularly for payroll, the other half was being set aside for the new youth programs which the church plans to initiate and which are expected to become its principal ministry. If Salvatore were to walk away, the church would have to close its doors.

 

            The judge’s decision placed great weight on the church’s parlous finances, and the hardship it would suffer if this deal were to fall through. "While the court understands the plaintiff's desire to maintain this building as a historic building, the costs associated with either the restoration or a combination of relocation and restoration is overwhelming for a small parish that can barely break even on income and expenses," she wrote.

             

To watch a video of the demolition, visit The Stamford Advocate or click here: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid2133633001?bctid=66159737001